所以在鲶鱼和UpStudio切片机之间有一些初步的结果。
Below is a simple part; the white one is printed in ABS+ sliced using UpStudio, the other one (yellow) sliced in Catfish using ABS. I don’t expect the material change makes much difference but I’m unable to print in ABS+ using Catfish at the moment because of issues listed in previous posts.
You can see from these parts that the white one (UpStudio) has holes and gaps near the base of the key handle that extend all the way through the part. Closer images below:
UpStudio打印采用99%填充，0.1毫米高，正常速度。鲶鱼纹100%填充，2层轮廓，0.1mm高，正常速度。
There is a big difference here in the fill. It may not seem like much but this is the first time ever I’ve been able to print with more than one contour and at 100% on my UP300. This is also the first time I’ve been able to print without gaps in the flat surfaces.
I should point out the Catfish version pulled away from the raft a little but this I my fault I think as I selected hatched raft instead on using the default raft in catfish. I think in this mode it bypassed the bed leveling in the UP300. I will try again later and check the result.
总之，我认为鲶鱼看起来很有前途。目前还存在可用性方面的不足，无法像UpStudio那样更改单个支持，但这还不应该是一个成品。
我将使用鲶鱼的任何工程部分，需要强度或螺纹孔。如果我能得到腹肌+工作，这将是理想的。
For anyone having the边缘剥离/填充问题I would recommend to use Catfish.
